Author
Keywords
Abstract

After ten years and extensive debate of UNESCO s Convention on the Safeguarding of the Intangible Heritage (2003), workable definitions and frameworks for safeguarding Intangible Cultural Heritage (ICH) are either emergent or non-existent. This is particularly significant in the case of heritage mitigation associated with large-scale construction projects: where these entail population resettlement and/or landscape loss, recording ICH is necessary both for impact assessment and mitigation and for helping impacted-upon communities cope with trauma. Nevertheless, there is little discussion of how to implement ICH safeguarding frameworks in salvage contexts.This paper focuses on attempts to record ICH impacted upon by western Lesotho s Metolong Dam. We highlight the practical shortcomings of existing ICH definitions and safeguarding protocols. We discuss the methodology used at Metolong and its ethical entailments, and take inspiration from UNESCO policy (and debates thereupon) and other sources in an attempt to find a workable framework for ICH recording in development contexts.

Year of Publication
2013
Journal
World Archaeology
Volume
45
Number
4
Number of Pages
653-669
Date Published
oct
Publication Language
English
ISSN Number
00438243 (ISSN)
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84888012550&doi=10.1080%2f00438243.2013.823885&partnerID=40&md5=38f4300387ebb8a12d6cc64f6ed989e7
DOI
10.1080/00438243.2013.823885
Download citation