Egilea | |
Abstract |
This study reveals the academic review and reflection criticism of Taekwondo origin anomalies,and presents significance and value accordingly. The conclusions are as follows. First, there is a lot of short- term research results in the academic world about Taekwondo. However, since it is not clear about itsmorphological significance and values, it is necessary to clarify the educational systematization and correcthistorical identity and identity of various aspects of Taekwondo by reestablishing cultural recognition as intangible heritage of Taekwondo. Secondly, we judged 9 blocks constituting the association in the processof modernization of Taekwondo as an obstacle. But all martial arts should be characterized by them accordingto the wave. Therefore, it is necessary to establish the scope and scope of the history of Taekwondo and toestablish standards for formalization and standardization of historical academic methods. Thirdly, the researchesof Taekwondo academia have been very encouraging, and they were assets in terms of history, ideology andphilosophy. However, since there are no researches that reinterpret and reinterpret according to academicdebates and critical thinking in terms of integrated and microscopic viewpoints on Taekwondo prototypes,research should be conducted as a systematic analysis method in terms of the context of Taekwondo historyand nationality. In conclusion, it can be said that it is possible to utilize a comprehensive academic knowledgesystem through the correct historical and identity of Taekwondo and the cultural value of intangible heritage. |
Year of Publication |
2018
|
Revista académica |
The Korean Journal of Sport
|
Volume |
16
|
Zenbakia |
3
|
Number of Pages |
129-140
|
ISSN Number |
1738-3250
|
Download citation |