Egilea
Abstract

In this essay, Diana Taylor revisits her distinction between archive and performance. She analyses the weaknesses of attempts to keep performances alive when they risk becoming canonical, hence contradicting an essential feature of the repertoire. Retracing the rhetorical entanglements surrounding the emergence of UNESCO s concept of Intangible Cultural Heritage, she exposes the political and economic ramifications behind the institutional framing. She also acknowledges the power of disruption of economic forces in contexts where the aesthetic and cultural dimensions seem to prevail, turning performance into a product. She exposes the marketing ploys in Marina Abramović s re-performances and MoMA installation "The Artist is Present," arriving at an artistic result far removed from its claims to authenticity and presence.

Year of Publication
2016
Revista académica
Etudes Anglaises
Volume
69
Zenbakia
2
Number of Pages
149-161
Publisher: Klincksieck
Publication Language
English
ISSN Number
0014195X (ISSN)
URL
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84999143802&doi=10.3917%2fetan.692.0149&partnerID=40&md5=c54a20797ee4569a00287436980da546
DOI
10.3917/etan.692.0149
Download citation