Autor | |
Resumen |
The purpose of this paper is to compare the designation status of national intangible culturalheritage and city/do intangible cultural heritage, to clarify the differences and problems, and toidentify the criteria for distinguishing between them.Among the national intangible cultural heritages, 25 items classified as musical fields and 200similar city/do intangible cultural heritages were compared. The genre was divided into classicalvocal music, classical instrument music, folk vocal music, and folk instrument music.As a result of the survey, it was difficult to find items to be designated as a national intangiblecultural heritage. Highly localized items cannot be designated as a national intangible culturalheritage. Only items that do not have locality can be designated as a national intangible culturalheritage. The actual difference is due to the difference in thinking about intangible cultural heritagesystem. Therefore, the country and regions should work together on this issue. |
Volumen |
5
|
Número de páginas |
25-48
|
Numero ISSN |
2508-5905
|
Descargar cita |