01329nas a2200121   4500000000100000008004100001100001700042245011600059300001000175490000600185520100200191022001401193                                       d1 aKim Hey-Jung00aStudy on the Distinction between National Intangible Cultural Heritage and City/Do Intangible Cultural Heritage  a25-480 v53 aThe purpose of this paper is to compare the designation status of national intangible culturalheritage and city/do intangible cultural heritage, to clarify the differences and problems, and toidentify the criteria for distinguishing between them.Among the national intangible cultural heritages, 25 items classified as musical fields and 200similar city/do intangible cultural heritages were compared. The genre was divided into classicalvocal music, classical instrument music, folk vocal music, and folk instrument music.As a result of the survey, it was difficult to find items to be designated as a national intangiblecultural heritage. Highly localized items cannot be designated as a national intangible culturalheritage. Only items that do not have locality can be designated as a national intangible culturalheritage. The actual difference is due to the difference in thinking about intangible cultural heritagesystem. Therefore, the country and regions should work together on this issue.  a2508-5905