TY - JOUR
KW - Bucharest
KW - Built cultural heritage
KW - case studies
KW - Planning regulations
AU - H. Derer
AB - • Abstract: Unlike the intangible cultural heritage and the movable heritage, as com-ponents of urban and rural tissue, the historic buildings and the protected built areas are (also) subject to planning regulations meant to govern the given settlements as well as possible. On the other hand, as it is known, one of the three major cultural value types assigned, whenever appropriate, to ed-ifices, to built ensembles, to parts of or even to whole towns and villages, is referring to their status of uniqueness or, at least, of rar-ity. As a consequence, unlike the intangible cultural heritage and the movable heritage, built cultural heritage exists within the inter-ference area between the need to preserve its particular character and the need to gen-eralise imposed by urban planning instru-ments. Some of the issues resulting from this paradox have been identified, defined and illustrated by means of recent case studies.
BT - Transsylvania Nostra
LA - English; Romanian; Moldavian; Moldovan
M1 - 4
N1 - Publisher: Transsylvania Nostra Foundation
N2 - • Abstract: Unlike the intangible cultural heritage and the movable heritage, as com-ponents of urban and rural tissue, the historic buildings and the protected built areas are (also) subject to planning regulations meant to govern the given settlements as well as possible. On the other hand, as it is known, one of the three major cultural value types assigned, whenever appropriate, to ed-ifices, to built ensembles, to parts of or even to whole towns and villages, is referring to their status of uniqueness or, at least, of rar-ity. As a consequence, unlike the intangible cultural heritage and the movable heritage, built cultural heritage exists within the inter-ference area between the need to preserve its particular character and the need to gen-eralise imposed by urban planning instru-ments. Some of the issues resulting from this paradox have been identified, defined and illustrated by means of recent case studies.
PY - 2018
SP - 35
EP - 42
T2 - Transsylvania Nostra
TI - Built cultural heritage between its uniqueness and the need for planning regulations
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85076738008&partnerID=40&md5=91f088424a7a2bf26d9bd7c689d8e23a
VL - 12
SN - 18425631 (ISSN)
ER -