03694nas a2200445   4500000000100000000000100001000000100002008004100003260000800044653003400052653001300086653002600099653001700125653002500142653002400167653001500191653000800206653002300214653002600237653002600263653001300289653003200302653002300334653001500357653002300372653002300395653001300418100001700431700001500448700002100463700001700484700001800501700001800519245009100537856015100628300001000779490000700789520243200796022002003228       2021                            d  cfeb10aIntangible cultural heritages10aheritage10aHistoric preservation10aarchitecture10aArchitectural design10aIndustrial heritage10aIntangible10aBIM10aBIM execution plan10aCommunity of practice10aConstruction projects10aCultural10aDesign/methodology/approach10aHeritage buildings10aLife cycle10aMultiple buildings10aStructural feature10aTangible1 aDavid Heesom1 aPaul Boden1 aAnthony Hatfield1 aSagal Rooble1 aKatie Andrews1 aHadar Berwari00aDeveloping a collaborative HBIM to integrate tangible and intangible cultural heritage  uhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85085055762&doi=10.1108%2fIJBPA-04-2019-0036&partnerID=40&md5=a1d9e506bcfd39d5fe9cc6c95858a07a  a72-950 v393 aPurpose: The purpose of this paper is to report on the development of a collaborative Heritage Building Information Modelling (HBIM) of a 19th-century multi-building industrial site in the UK. The buildings were Grade II listed by Historic England for architectural and structural features. The buildings were also a key element of the industrial heritage and folklore of the surrounding area. As the site was due to undergo major renovation work, this project was initiated to develop a HBIM of the site that encapsulated both tangible and intangible heritage data. Design/methodology/approach: The design of the research in this study combined multiple research methods. Building on an analysis of secondary data surrounding HBIM, a community of practice was established to shape the development of an HBIM execution plan (HBEP) and underpin the collaborative BIM development. The tangible HBIM geometry was predominantly developed using a scan to BIM methodology, whereas intangible heritage data were undertaken using unstructured interviews and a focus group used to inform the presentation approach of the HBIM data. Findings: The project produced a collaboratively generated multi-building HBIM. The study identified the need for a dedicated HBEP that varies from prevailing BIM execution plans on construction projects. Tangible geometry of the buildings was modelled to LOD3 of the Historic England guidelines. Notably, the work identified the fluid nature of intangible data and the need to include this in an HBIM to fully support design, construction and operation of the building after renovation. A methodology was implemented to categorise intangible heritage data within a BIM context and an approach to interrogate these data from within existing BIM software tools. Originality/Value: The paper has presented an approach to the development of HBIM for large sites containing multiple buildings/assets. The framework implemented for an HBEP can be reproduced by future researchers and practitioners wishing to undertake similar projects. The method for identifying and categorising intangible heritage information through the developed level of intangible cultural heritage was presented as new knowledge. The development of HBIM to bring together tangible and intangible data has the potential to provide a model for future work in the field and augment existing BIM data sets used during the asset lifecycle.  a23984708 (ISSN)