A Study on the point at issue of ICHPEDIA project \& Arirang-heritage assignment

Now the center of a war of cultures appears to be placed on the Arirang. Review of intangible cultural properties of Arirang and received a positive assessment of the reassignment of UNESCO. The world intangible cultural heritage has been proven to be. Verification is at the heart of the Korean Arirang’s tradition and identity can be said to retool for the strengthening of. Therefore, you should review the regional aspect of the Arirang again. Arirang s intangible cultural heritage is not an asset of a particular individual KoreansJoint assets. This gave us as heritage of the locality, the universality, should take into account the current surname. New aspects of the cultural heritage administration in checking for the Arirang more desirable method of succession would have to be started. In particular, details on the verification measures are needed.In this respect, the current cultural heritage administration carried out in the “national archives on the safeguarding of the intangible cultural heritage and intangible cultural heritage online all survey” ICHPEDIA when a proper business. So far, the discussion has never been more popular and cultural properties preservation as dropouts from measures provided. Participating researchers to build a service that is equally valuable, saying archive. Arirang’s case lies in the full Edition and distribution through the intangible cultural heritage as phases. In addition, in the course of history, Arirang’s sound punishment, a succession of organizations, communities, local authorities, inventorying, etc. seems to participate. Just in the course of the intangible, the lack of expression of the limits that, due to the condition of the missing, including the context of judging authenticity, turned out to be fossilized. Complement and follow-up action is necessary. The ICHPEDIA is an extension of the project by expanding the discussion in seven different proposals were presented.