03364nas a2200457   4500000000100000000000100001008004100002653001100043653003800054653002100092653003500113653001100148653002800159653001700187653001200204653001400216653000900230653001800239653003200257653002000289653002900309653003400338653004200372653001000414653001600424653001500440653002500455653002800480653003900508653001700547653001700564100001200581700001300593700001400606700001600620245013600636856014800772490000700920520195900927022002002886                                       d10acities10aConservation of Natural Resources10aGIS-DEA-MI model10aGeographic information systems10aHumans10aSustainable development10aurbanization10aarticle10aATTENTION10acity10acity planning10acultural landscape heritage10aDecision making10aEnvironmental protection10aGeographic information system10aheritage preservation and utilization10ahuman10aInheritance10aprocedures10aqualitative analysis10aSustainable development10asustainable development efficiency10aurban fringe10aurbanization1 aHan Zou1 aYang Liu1 aBaihao Li1 aWenjing Luo00aSustainable Development Efficiency of Cultural Landscape Heritage in Urban Fringe Based on GIS-DEA-MI, a Case Study of Wuhan, China  uhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85140899539&doi=10.3390%2fijerph192013061&partnerID=40&md5=0a4f84ed71463554bbdd69ecf5c02b210 v193 aCultural landscape heritage refers to the rare and irreplaceable cultural landscapes recognized by UNESCO and the World Heritage Committee. It is recognized as a “common works of nature and human beings” of outstanding significance and universal value, and is a type of world heritage. Dueto construction, land isincreasingly limited in urban and rural areasin the process of urbanization, and cultural landscape heritage faces a huge threat, especially larger culturallandscapeheritagelocated at the edgesof cities. However, most of the existing studies have mainly focused on the material protection of heritage but have not paid enough attention to the non-material aspects of heritage sites, failing to reveal the inseparable nature of heritage and land. Therefore, this study takes sustainable development efficiency as its analysis tool, examines two pieces of cultural landscape heritage (the Panlongcheng site and the Tomb of the King of the Ming Dynasty) in the urban edge area of Wuhan, China as examples, innovates and establishes a multidimensional evaluation method based on the GIS-DEA-Ml model, and compares the dynamic changes of the spatial development efficiency and non-spatial development efficiency of the above two cultural landscape heritage cases. The results show that: both the spatial development efficiency and non-spatial development efficiency of Panlongcheng from 2010 to 2019 are significantly higher than that of the Tomb. This method makes up for the deficiency of traditional subjective qualitative analysis. It can be used to study the development efficiency of cultural landscape heritage more objectively and comprehensively, and promote the overall sustainable development of material and intangible cultural heritage. It can provide the basis for early decision-making and post-implementation evaluation for the preservation and utilization of cultural landscape heritage under the background of urban renewal.  a16617827 (ISSN)