TY - JOUR
KW - Authorised heritage discourse (AHD)
KW - Cadre noir
KW - Classical horsemanship
KW - Emergent authorised ich discourse
KW - ICH inscription
KW - Implicit criteria
KW - Spanish riding school
AU - Sarah Sargent
AB - Tensions remain as to the place that heritage elements with elite European origins should have in intangible cultural heritage. Intangible cultural heritage (ICH) makes a definitive break from understandings about heritage as material, monumental and European. The creation of an ICH regime was meant to counteract bias against non-European elements then occurring in recognition of tangible heritage elements. But whether heritage elements with elite European origins should be accepted as intangible heritage, and on what terms, remains unsettled. Additionally, whether a discourse has emerged that is separate from that of tangible heritage has been the source of a great deal of debate and examination. This article considers the nominations of France and Austria to inscribe their respective heritage elements of classical horsemanship. Classical horsemanship has elite European origins. Through this discussion, there is an examination of the extent to which ICH has established its own counter-narrative, and what the implications of such a narrative will be for heritage generally. This article argues that exclusion of elements from ICH inscription on the basis of elite European origins should not be regarded as a positive development. Instead, this would simply repeat the mistakes of bias, rather than allowing for an evaluation of the heritage element in its own right.
BT - International Journal of Intangible Heritage
DO - 10.35638/ijih.2016..11.004
LA - English
N1 - Publisher: National Folk Museum of Korea
N2 - Tensions remain as to the place that heritage elements with elite European origins should have in intangible cultural heritage. Intangible cultural heritage (ICH) makes a definitive break from understandings about heritage as material, monumental and European. The creation of an ICH regime was meant to counteract bias against non-European elements then occurring in recognition of tangible heritage elements. But whether heritage elements with elite European origins should be accepted as intangible heritage, and on what terms, remains unsettled. Additionally, whether a discourse has emerged that is separate from that of tangible heritage has been the source of a great deal of debate and examination. This article considers the nominations of France and Austria to inscribe their respective heritage elements of classical horsemanship. Classical horsemanship has elite European origins. Through this discussion, there is an examination of the extent to which ICH has established its own counter-narrative, and what the implications of such a narrative will be for heritage generally. This article argues that exclusion of elements from ICH inscription on the basis of elite European origins should not be regarded as a positive development. Instead, this would simply repeat the mistakes of bias, rather than allowing for an evaluation of the heritage element in its own right.
PY - 2016
SP - 35
EP - 53
T2 - International Journal of Intangible Heritage
TI - Classical Horsemanship and the Dangers of the Emergent Intangible Cultural. Heritage Authorised Discourse
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84994893758&partnerID=40&md5=0382f6ca53dfc81d538043c0fe8ae2f8
VL - 11
SN - 19753586 (ISSN)
ER -