02342nas a2200229 4500000000100000000000100001008004100002653001900043653002200062653003200084653002100116653003300137653003000170100001300200700001800213245011800231856015400349300001200503490000700515520157000522022002002092 d10aInterpretation10aculinary heritage10aculinary heritage workshops10aheritage tourism10aIntangible cultural heritage10ainterpretation principles1 aSin Chiu1 aWei-Jue Huang00aHeritage interpretation from supply and demand perspectives: the case of culinary heritage workshops in Hong Kong uhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85133543359&doi=10.1080%2f1743873X.2022.2091936&partnerID=40&md5=be24e3dafd2e7fdcc2f2894a492e1572 a563-5920 v173 aInterpretation helps visitors understand the value of resources and the need for preservation. Existing interpretation principles focus more on natural and built heritage sites, rather than intangible cultural heritage, such as traditional foodways. Hence, this study examined the interpretation of culinary heritage from the supply side (i.e. heritage owners and tour operators) and demand side (i.e. visitors), and revealed how culinary heritage interpretation differs from that of tangible heritage. First, existing interpretation principles in the literature were categorized and synthesized. Next, Hong Kong was selected as the study site. Observations were conducted on nine culinary heritage workshops in Hong Kong, and thirty heritage owners/operators and workshop participants were interviewed. Findings revealed that ‘culinary’ elements were introduced through a standardized process with value-added activities, whereas ‘heritage’ interpretations were non-standardized. From the perspectives of consumers and suppliers, five themes of effective interpretation were identified respectively. Participants seek interpretations that are personalized by heritage owners, showcase all possible traditions, and enable post-event sharing. Owners/operators design interpretations that facilitate idea exchange and promote innovative revitalization. A new model is proposed for culinary heritage interpretation, which extends the interpretation timeframe to pre-, during, and post-event and highlights the needs and personal involvement of heritage owners. a1743873X (ISSN)