02658nas a2200457 4500000000100000000000100001008004100002653002100043653000700064653001900071653002500090653001100115653003300126653002900159653000800188653000800196653002300204653003100227653001900258653002300277653002300300653000700323653000800330653002200338653002800360653001900388653001800407653002100425653002400446653002300470100001800493700002100511700003300532700002400565245012200589856006500711300000800776490000600784520139600790022001402186 d10aBenefit transfer10aC510aCLIMATE-CHANGE10acontingent valuation10aEurope10aIntangible cultural heritage10aMeta-regression analysis10aQ5310aQ5410aTRAVEL COST METHOD10aTangible cultural heritage10aValue transfer10aWillingness-To-pay10awillingness to pay10aZ110aZ1810acultural heritage10aenvironmental economics10aglobal economy10ameta-analysis10aparameterization10aregression analysis10awillingness to pay1 aGeorge Halkos1 aPhoebe Koundouri1 aPanagiotis-Stavros Aslanidis1 aAngelos Plataniotis00aEvaluating the tangible and intangible parameters of cultural heritage: an economic meta-analysis in a global context uhttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s43621-024-00398-w a1870 v53 aSustainable development ensures the longevity of civilization by balancing economic growth, environmental protection, and social equity. The present study evaluates cultural heritage assets via a meta-regression analysis function transfer, in which 85 studies were examined that revealed 106 different willingness-to-pay (WTP) values in the period 1995-2022. The meta-regression methodology enables the valuation of cultural heritage-tangible and intangible-goods and services, as well as cultural values (e.g. aesthetic, spiritual, symbolic, etc.). The utilization of WTP would enable us to compare the two models (i.e., European and non-European) on how much a citizen would value cultural heritage based on non-market valuation. The results would inform policymakers about the importance of cultural heritage assets in the sustainable development agenda. The empirical findings present that the WTP for the European sample is 37.6\textlesseuro\textgreater and for the non-European is 60.12\textlesseuro\textgreater. In essence, the Europeans are influenced mainly by intangible cultural assets, whereas non-Europeans are influenced by oral tradition. Overall, cultural heritage conservation necessitates for proper economic valuation through a holistic approach, in short-the valuation of both tangible and intangible cultural goods and services is imperative for sustainable development. a2662-9984