02205nas a2200217   4500000000100000000000100001008004100002653004100043653002600084653005500110653005500165653001400220100002200234700001200256245017700268856014800445300001000593490000600603520135800609022002001967                                       d10aConstitutional amendment no. 96/201710aDialogue among powers10aDirect action of unconstitutionality no. 4.983/ ce10aProposed amendment to the constitution n. 304/201710aVaquejada1 aMonia Hennig Leal1 aMaria y00a"Dialogue" among Powers in Brazil? From inconstitutionality of vaquejada s practice regulation to vaquejada as a Brazilian intangible cultural heritage: a critical analysis  uhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85044253523&doi=10.5380%2frinc.v5i1.56031&partnerID=40&md5=d1009b0a86860de709bca03995197828  a63-810 v53 aThe (un)constitutionality of vaquejada s practice recently has become the center of Judiciary, Executive and Legislative analysis in Brazil. In a matter of months, the practice was considerate an unconstitutionality by Brazilian Federal Supreme Court, it has been recognized by law as a Brazilian cultural heritage and was object to an Amendment Proposed to the Constitution, of which accrue n. 96 Constitutional Amendment that excluded from the cruel practices those resulting from cultural practices that regulate and ensure animal s welfare. It s intended, in this context, to analyze whether the posture adopted by Powers of State sustained itself in an institutional dialogue or ignored the harmonic relation inherent to Principle of Separation Powers, being used for such thing the deductive method. In a first moment is analyzed the Direct Action of Unconstitutionality n. 4.983/CE and, after, the PAC referred, as well as Law n. 13.364/16 and Constitutional Amendment n. 96, being, lastly, addressed the question about the institutional dialogue. It can be extracted of this set of decisions taken by the three Powers the attempt to realize a dialogue by Legislative Power, at least as regards to the arguments utilization that try to counteract those that had been taken to a declaration of unconstitutionality by the higher Brazilian Tribunal.  a23595639 (ISSN)