01663nas a2200253   4500000000100000008004100001653001600042653002400058653002300082653003000105653002800135653003300163653002500196653002600221653002000247653002800267100001500295700001300310245009700323300001200420490001200432520095100444020001401395       2012                            d10aBase points10aComparative studies10aCultural heritages10aEnvironmental regulations10ageographical indication10aIntangible cultural heritage10aIntellctual property10aInternational society10aResearch topics10aSustainable development1 aLi Hongmei1 aShan Jie00aConstruction of Geographical Indications Protective Pattern on Intangible Cultural Heritages  a409-4120 v347-3533 aMany people currently ignore the validity of the fact that intangible cultural heritages acting as an objective of intellectual property law, and make exploitation wantonly, which cause intangible cultural heritages to be on the verge of extinction. How to change the status quo has been the most important research topic of common concern in international society. The thesis exerts comparative studies on feasibility of protection on intangible cultural heritages by various kinds of intellectual properties, based on the characteristics of regional-natured, collective-natured, perpetual-natured, etc. owned by intangible cultural heritages. The thesis expounds highly agreement between geographical indications and intangible cultural heritages. With this base point, the thesis puts forward some countermeasures on geographical indications protection on intangible cultural heritages in terms of subjects, objects, and limitations on rights.  a1022-6680