01353nas a2200193   4500000000100000000000100001000000100002008004100003653002000044653001900064653001100083653003300094653002700127100001200154245007400166856014600240520075300386022002001139       2018                            d10aChannel Islands10aGerman Bunkers10aGhosts10aIntangible cultural heritage10aTangible Intangibility1 aG. Carr00aConcrete’s memory: Positioning ghosts of war in the Channel Islands  uhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85094129980&doi=10.4000%2fTERRAIN.16661&partnerID=40&md5=22b63be026ee1632c93be193ae7333053 aThis paper explores the constraints upon archaeologists who working in the field of heritage studies who encounter tales of haunting, or have their own experiences with ghosts, during fieldwork. The discipline lacks the terminology to describe, analyse or understand such experiences, leading to either omissions, embarrassed anecdotes at the end of ‘serious’ discussions of fieldwork, or talking in metaphors. Using the case study of the Channel Islands, this paper explores ways in which archaeologists can talk and write about ghosts through recent understandings of the concept of ‘heritage’, through a rejection of UNESCO’s definitions of Intangible Cultural Heritage, and the adoption of the concept of ‘tangible intangibility’.  a07605668 (ISSN)