01970nas a2200337   4500000000100000000000100001008004100002260006400043653001700107653002800124653001500152653002300167653001900190653002200209653002000231653002400251653002000275653001900295653001900314653002500333653002400358653001500382653002800397100001500425245003500440856017000475300001200645490000700657520094800664020002001612       2020                            d  bInternational Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing10aarchitecture10aArtificial intelligence10aBoundaries10acultural landscape10aEarth sciences10aHuman settlements10aIn compositions10aintangible heritage10aMuseum exhibits10aNatural milieu10aRemote sensing10aSoftware engineering10aTheory and practice10aVernacular10avernacular architecture1 aK. Kovács00aBeyond vernacular architecture  uhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85090943332&doi=10.5194%2fisprs-archives-XLIV-M-1-2020-767-2020&partnerID=40&md5=5a4fb86730383be37dc63f87e0127670  a767-7720 v543 aWhen John Ruskin “discovered” vernacular architecture, it was a rich heritage still in the making. Contrary to most of the other kinds of valuable built remains of cultures gone, vernacular architecture has been well alive, vigorously creative and yet ancient. Besides being continuously inhabited, it has been conserved in open-air museums and reinterpreted through national styles seeking inspiration from it. The former usually resulted in houses turned into museum exhibits; the latter inevitably resulted in compositions designed by trained architects. Alongside this process, there occurred progressive disappearance of vernacular crafts and ways of life. There is, however, a lesson that built vernacular heritage can still teach us: better integration of human settlements to the environment What lies beyond vernacular architecture or the theory and practice of its preservation, is the reinvention of the boundaries of localness.  a16821750 (ISSN)