02066nas a2200313   4500000000100000000000100001008004100002260002200043653002900065653003900094653002200133653002000155653001200175653002400187653002600211653004000237653001900277653002100296653002700317653002500344100001400369700001300383700001600396245006400412856014900476300001200625520109000637020002501727       2021                            d  bCRC Press/Balkema10aCitizen s participations10aConservation of cultural heritages10aCumulative voting10aDecision making10aEcuador10aFuzzy Delphi Method10aHistoric preservation10aInterpretative structural modelling10aMulti-criteria10aMultiple process10aProject prioritization10aUrban revitalization1 aJ. López1 aD. Pulla1 aJ. Carvallo00aCitizen integration in project prioritization methodologies  uhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85117728340&doi=10.1201%2f9781003182016-15&partnerID=40&md5=1f4f4e0b5abf446076ea3d32667323a0  a118-1243 aExpert-led multicriteria methodologies might have significant improvements in terms of relevance and effectiveness when citizen participation is integrated. This inclusion is especially influential regarding urban revitalization projects (URPs) prioritization, which directly affects the conservation of cultural heritage. The objective is to apply an existing multicriteria methodology for URPs’ prioritization in Sígsig, Ecuador and extend it integrating citizen participation. The final methodology uses multiple processes, such as FDM (Fuzzy Delphi Method), ISM (Interpretative Structural Modeling), the integrated phase of CV (Cumulative Voting), and ANP (Analytic Network Process). Results show how citizen integration in these methodologies inherently embeds cultural heritage in the final URP. Conclusions address the importance to integrate participative tools as a way to legitimize urban decision-making processes, along with identifying, strengthening, and preserving intangible heritage, such as traditional craftsmanship, tangible heritage, and archaeological remains.  a9781032021294 (ISBN)