01797nam a2200181   4500000000100000000000100001008004100002260002000043653002600063653002400089653002100113653003300134653001700167100001400184245011200198520128500310020002001595       2019                            d  bSpringer Nature10aCommunity archaeology10aintangible heritage10aLegal frameworks10aMeletse/Madimatle case study10aSouth Africa1 aN. Ndlovu00aBarriers to Community Archaeology: Reviewing the Legal Heritage Frameworks Within the South African Context3 aThe archaeological landscape in South Africa has been changing, from one defined by the domination of white males to one now defined by women and acknowledging the role of local communities. While this is a welcomed approach to providing insights about the past, the “playing field” is still defined by the minority. As a result, the participation by local communities within archaeological projects happens within a paradigm of thinking defined by legal requirements which may be in contrasts to the beliefs they hold. This is, therefore, not a partnership that should be considered representative of everyone involved. Instead, it is biased towards the professionals. For instance, legal definitions of what heritage is and how such resources should be protected do not, in my view, correlate with an African perspective of heritage. I would argue, therefore, that views by local communities over what is heritage and how best to manage it are in most times ignored in the name of community archaeology and the legal framework within which such a relationship should occur. This chapter, focusing on community archaeology from a heritage management perspective, is a review of the legal challenges negatively affecting community archaeology within the South African context.  a26258641 (ISSN)