02436nas a2200337   4500000000100000000000100001008004100002653001400043653001900057653002200076653002300098653001300121653002400134653001200158653002300170653002200193653001400215653001300229653001500242653001800257653001900275653001900294653002200313100001700335245008200352856015400434300001200588490000700600520147100607022002002078                                       d10aLandscape10aUnited Kingdom10acultural heritage10acultural landscape10adwelling10aearly modern period10aHistory10ahousing conditions10alandscape history10amodernity10amovement10aperception10aresearch work10asense of place10asocial history10atheoretical study1 aNicola Whyte00aSenses of Place, Senses of Time: Landscape History from a British Perspective  uhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84947494315&doi=10.1080%2f01426397.2015.1074987&partnerID=40&md5=70682857b8049167efe3babb12c0769f  a925-9380 v403 aA vast and varied literature exists on the history and archaeology of vernacular landscapes, yet still heritage ‘value’ is often weighted towards the extravagant landscapes created by powerful elites. This article is concerned to bring the wealth of historic landscape and archival research closer together with recent theoretical writing on landscape and dwelling, by focusing on the early modern period in particular. Recent theoretical approaches open up creative space for thinking through the archival material and invites landscape historians to think in terms of movement and dwelling as essential to understanding landscape at the human scale. As this article attempts to show, this is by no means a one-sided dialogue; rather historical landscape research can inform theoretical work in new and productive ways. Bridging the gaps between research areas has the potential to enrich our understanding of everyday landscapes as heritage, created by ordinary people going about their day-to-day activities. The paper argues for the importance of recasting mundane, commonplace features of the landscape—roads, fields and boundaries—as an essential part of our social and cultural landscape heritage. Read in this light, the archival sources suggest that the meanings afforded to the extant remains of the past in the landscape were made through intangible heritage practices, customs, memories, naming, rituals and performances by ‘ordinary’ people.  a01426397 (ISSN)