02051nas a2200205   4500000000100000000000100001008004100002260001300043653001100056653001900067653001900086653002600105653002200131100001500153245005500168856015200223300001100375520143900386020002001825       2017                            d  bSpringer10aUNESCO10aWorld heritage10aUrban heritage10aConservation policies10aIntangible values1 aS Sandholz00aHeritage and Conservation in Changing Environments  uhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85060629015&doi=10.1007%2f978-3-319-43735-4_5&partnerID=40&md5=82525dfb17e20dc9f61f7e3f6c516eab  a53-1013 aThe cities of Kathmandu, Nepal, Yogyakarta, Indonesia and Recife, Brazil were analyzed based up on their urban development, drivers of change, urban and heritage policies, as well as the phases of urban regeneration. In all three cities the urban outline is changing, induced by rapid urban change. The centres, however, still comprise of heritage buildings and places, often attached to intangible values still appreciated by the urban population. The comparative analysis of the case studies reveals major impact clusters influencing on the urban centre. Common problems of conservation legal frameworks are overlaps or contradictions between documents issued on different administrative levels or by different authorities and outdated contents. In addition, the execution of the legal framework in force is often poor and hardly reflecting interlinkages of tangible and intangible heritage. The attachment to the historic urban core is still strong in all cases. The centres are of importance, the same applies to distinct places of remembrance and particularly to different forms of intangible heritage. However, the overall awareness and recognition of intangible values seems comparably fuzzier than in the case of tangible heritage and may result in potential losses. To develop suitable strategies for regenerating the historic centres the triggers of urban change as well as their interlinkages have to be taken into account.  a2365757X (ISSN)